| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Double-Secret Probation? |
~> SH> banned by the echo rules. OK. So I tell the idiot to fuck off. Then ~> SH> Casssell bans me for flaming, which I have just been told by the ~> SH> co-moderator is not against the rules. ~> I banned you for continuing your "Fuck Off" campaign against Sauer, after ~> having warned you once about it before and you having acknowledged that ~> warning. Every echo you come into in which Sauer is also a user of, does not ~> have to be your personal battelground to fight him in or on. You also referenced his post to Ceppa. Since it cannot be the "no cussing" rule (it didn't exist yet!), was there a rule that Stan cannot insult Dan and Otto because he has insulted them elsewhere? Does that go both directions? He did not import a specific thread or issue from another echo, which is what your 1/20/09 warning seemed to relate to. And then you followed that up with advising that Stan not engage Otto in any posts without advising Otto of the same. Now take a look at the Sauer post to Ceppa that Stan was responding to. He accuses Stan of acting in a "knee-jerk" fashion by defending the Catholic Church against charges of "molesting priests." Why? "Naturally," simply because he is Catholic. And he accuses Ed of defending Mormons on all matters "no matter how silly," simply because of being a Mormon. So if I am following you on this, you are defending the position that Dan and Sauer were NOT attacking anyone's religion in a direct manner so as to offend or agitate? And you believe that the Sauer comments about Ed and Stan have no basis at all in any desire Sauer might have to use the echo as a battleground against them? [As a sidenote, WHERE WAS this defense of molesting priests that Sauer spoke of? In what thread did Stan make any such defense? Sure looks like a "battleground" comment based on Sauer's pre-existing animosity.] But you believe that Stan's responses to Dan and to Sauer, responses to what they ACTUALLY DID SAY in that echo, were based in matters outside the echo? I'd really like to figure this out before I post much in there. Looks tricky. --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a* Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:124/311) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 140/1 226/0 236/150 249/303 SEEN-BY: 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 SEEN-BY: 396/45 633/260 267 712/848 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 2905/0 @PATH: 124/311 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.