| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Corporate variant (SUS) of Windows Update |
From: Jeff Shultz
Geo. wrote:
> "Jan van Hoek (NL)" wrote in message
> news:VA.000001d2.0037ddc6{at}xs4alldot.nl...
>
>> I'm not that afraid for the spoofing problem. The download process
>> starts on a Microsoft website with an IP-address that you have to trust
>> anyway. And that launching website is the source of subsequent
>> subsidiary websites, which you have to trust too.
>
> Yes, but if those subsequent subsidiary websites are not under Microsoft's
> control (if they outsource the downloads) then how can they claim it's
> secure because it's not under their control at that point.
>
> Geo.
Isn't their outsource Akamai or somesuch? I guess it's a "secondlevel
secure" thing - they told MS they were secure in such a way that MS
trusts them, therefore MS can say they are secure.
--
Jeff Shultz
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.