Hi Joe,

>>> Name a politician who has not made `mistatements`  They all lie, but
>>> call it bending the truth.  As for her judgement, from this side of
>>> the border things look fine.

>> Not to me ...She favored the Iraq War. She believes the U.S.
>> should've intervened in Iran during the failed Green Revolution. She urged
>> U.S. intervention in Libya. And she unsuccessfully lobbied for the U.S. to
>> assist anti-government rebels in Syria.... in line with that, and to me
>> worse than anything however is that Hillary Clinton is quite
>> Republican"esque" in her political leanings. This is a known fact. It's no
>> secret that Clinton has accepted huge sums of money from private speeches
>> for various big-ticket corporations like Goldman-Sachs, UBS, Morgan
>> Stanley, and Deutsche Bank... No doubt people here who see that wonder if
>> we can trust a "President Hillary" to work to curtail the practices of
>> America's big banks when she herself is one of
>> their biggest beneficiaries?

>A lot of people favoured the Iraq war.

A lot of people didn't as well.

>  If you believed the lies from the then
> President`s intel, you might be so inclined.  As for being paid for speeches,
> what is the big deal.  A lot of people do inluding many GOP, and no doubt
>Donald Trump.

The big deal is what it means given her hawkish political mindset.  You don't
accept such huge fees from corporations, etc. and not have to pay for it with
reciprocal behavior.

> Is Bernie going to travel to give a speech for free.  Unless it
>benefits him politically I dont think so.

He hasn't yet...  He's done more in the Senate throughout his tenure there for
this country than HRC ever did even when she was Secretary of State here.  A do
nothing Secretary... she was once a Goldwater supporter.. geez.. (sorry, really
irks me as you can probably tell )

> I still think he is too old.  There
> should be an age restriction, just like there is a term restriction.

Some people maintain their wits at an old age... At 74, Bernie is such a one
IMO  But I understand if that's the way you feel.  We'll just have to agree
to disgree :)

> As for
>Polls, they can be wrong, and have been wrong.  Which candidate was it who was
> considered a shoe-in for the job and even I think the NY Times had already
> published the headlines of his winning, when the unthinkable happened and his
>opponent won.  The polls said otherwise :)  This was many years ago to be sure

Of course.. look at what the pundits were predicting in the 19 states that
Bernie has won so far (with a virtual tie in Kentucky).... No one thought that
would happen either.

Take care,
Janis

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-2