Richard Webb wrote in a message to Dallas Hinton:


DH> He's not in the Nodelist -- but I don't know if he ever was! 

 RW>   NEver really looked.  tHis points up another reason
 RW> why I keep arguing that admin stuff, or quasi official
 RW> functions such as the echolist should be addressable by
 RW> FIdonet primarily, even if by routed mail only.  Makes no
 RW> sense to have a moderator of a backboned echo who does not
 RW> participate in FIdonet, even as a user on somebody's system, but
 RW> that's a topic for another echo.


The echolist is NOT part of Fidonet, so you can wish all you want...

As far as I know, there is no requirement that a moderator have a node
number.  Many echoes were and are moderated by users of a BBS.


cya,
thom
http://www.echolist.net/ 
--- GEcho 1.20/Pro