WD> Phil,
 WD>
>> A very good case.  I find that right to be armed amongst the highest of
>> our rights.
 WD>
 WD> Correct me if I'm wrong but the right to bear arms was that not
 WD> intended to defend the colonies against the British king?
 WD>

Muich more to it than that... inluding the ability of the people to be able
to resist corrupt government.

>> If the citizens are disarmed, then only the cops and criminals will have
>> weapons... both are of equal threat and danger these days.
 WD>
 WD> Interesting point, and not without merrit.

Phil

--- FMail/Win32 1.60
Netwo (1:267/169)