PE>> It uses the one that I posted some code for in this echo a
PE>> couple of weeks ago, which is NOT the one documented by the RFC
PE>> that was made available from here recently. BFN. Paul. 

BL> I don't remember that... can you post it again? 

Ok.

BL> RFC-822 is as good 
BL> as useless. It's the classic example of how a university-wanker can write 
BL> 100 pages on something that could have been done in 20 lines, a lot 
BL> clearer.

RFC-822 is the equivalent of the Type-2+ PKT format, nothing to do with the
comms negotation protocol (UUCICO).  I thought we were talking about the
latter.  Anyway, better go and repost that before I forget.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---