On 28 Sep 99 01:08pm, Kris Steenhaut wrote to Bas Heijermans:

 KS> No. The big problem with Matrox are the Matrox drivers. These
 KS> drivers don't cope too well with sharing IRQ. That's the reason
 KS> why the Matrox behave well on older systems, and why they have
 KS> problems on newer one's.

Please.  You're so far out in left field you need a space shuttle to
keep in touch.  My hardware (and the hardware for the 50+ systems at the
Clearwater airport I maintain) is the latest and have no problems with
Matrox cards or drivers.  I'm talking a mixture of clones plus name
brands like Compaq, IBM, Dell and NEC.

If you're going to "try" and rub a product into the dirt, at least know
what you're talking about before the attempt.

 KS> You are absolutely wrong about that. Comm404 behaved rather
 KS> well, the new comm461 is stable and works well.

More stable now with Beta2 but that couldn't be claimed just a few weeks
ago.  You forget, I beta test Comm 4.61 also so I'm well aware of the
problems people have been having with it.  Video drivers have NOT been
any major issue, Matrox or not.  So, try again.

 KS> It is on the contrary my impression, Netscape was (and is)
 KS> falsely blamed for problems caused by the Matrox drivers.

Then you haven't been following the beta information very close.

George


... If your feet smell and your nose runs - you're built upside down.
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.4P [Reg]