On 29/05/2016 6:24 PM, Alan Ianson -> David Drummond wrote:
 AI> On 05/29/16, David Drummond said the following...

 AI>>> That was not an election, it was a putsch.

 DD>> That is your opinion.

 AI> That is a fact, not an opinion.

There are no facts, just opinions of what the facts are.

No violent takeover of government was staged. An election was called, votes
cast, and a successful candidate named. An election happened.

 DD>> In the English speaking world, when votes are
 DD>> called for, for a candidate or two, that constitutes an election.

 AI> Votes were counted a few months before Michiel and Bjorn began their
 AI> Putsch. That was an election.

And another was called and held at the time mandated by the echo rules. That
your Supreme Leader took eight months to conduct the previous election does not
matter, it was time for another.

 AI> Michiel and Bjorn's brouhaha (Bjorn's word for it) doesn't even resemble
an
 AI> election.

What defines an election in your language then? Is it anything like calling an
election, calling for candidates, accepting votes, and announcing the
successful candidate.

In your culture does you government call for a vote to see if an election
should be held at the mandated time?

Luckily there is no government here, it is true socialism, we are ruled by
ourselves.

 AI> It resembles control and manipulation, in an English speaking world.

It might in your version of English - but not in others.

Who do you feel was controlled or manipulated? The deniers among us do not
recognise that an election was held, according to them it did not happen.
Therefore there was no election, no putsch, no control and no manipulation. You
are just typing empty words.

-- 

Regards
David

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0