From: "Robert Comer" 

> I'm on 4.6.x, so you're living in the future from my POV.

You'll like it then, the UI got better in 5.0, so unless they went
completely backwards...

One thing I have heard about is their single signon has messed up a few
computers, so you might want to test that on something you can wipe first.
(it started with 5.11, but I'm betting there's some common code.)

> I'd rather have RAID5 and SCSI, but given the environment I think it
> will exceed my needs even so.

Me too, but it'll do like you say.

> Do you have any NAS experience?

Only with Snap! type servers  Small, very low end, runs Linux internally
and joins your NT4 domain for authentication, as well as a web and FTP
interface.

- Bob Comer


"Richard B."  wrote in message
news:8ku12053hgbpk4h7n5nkgfv397d1u6irf8{at}4ax.com...
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:07:01 -0500, "Robert Comer"
>  wrote:
>
> >Definitely wouldn't, darn keyboard. 
>
> Yeah, I've had trouble with them recently as well. 
>
> >There's not even a whisper from division about 6.5 yet, we're still at
> >5.0...
>
> I'm on 4.6.x, so you're living in the future from my POV.
>
> >Sounds like it'll be a nice machine!
>
> I'd rather have RAID5 and SCSI, but given the environment I think it
> will exceed my needs even so.
>
> Do you have any NAS experience?
>
> - Richard

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5