Hello Peter.

02 Jun 06 20:29, you wrote to me:

 MvdV>>>> Obviously it is unreasonable to demand that the host
 MvdV>>>> makes all the calls to deliver the mail.

 PK>>> But you can't say that, because you are just invalidating your
 PK>>> previous statement on the issue.

 MvdV>> Well I just said it didn't I? What previous statement did I
 MvdV>> invalidate?

 PK> In a previous breath you were saying that the NC should place all
 PK> calls to deliver mail to all Nodes.

I never said that. What I said is that P4 does *not* say who is to call who.

You are putting words into my mouth and then drawing conlusions from them.
And unfortunaltely this is not the only example. In this and your previous
message there are many more examples to be found. I could go through them
again and point then out to you, but I really lack the energy to to all
this useless work.

 PK> and now its "Obviously it is unreasonable...". Do you not
wonder why
 PK> people have a hard time understandng what you REALLY mean?

Plus that you are twisting my words out of context. What I claimed is that
P4 does not state who has to make the calls. And yes, it is *my opinion*
that having the host make all calls is unreasonable when the calls are not
free.

No contradiction, my opinion about what is reasonable need not be what P4
says about how it is or what it does not say.

In the rest of the message you continue this trend of twisting my words and
lifting them out of context and frankly I get tired of it. You have not
convinced me and obviously I am unable to convice you.

So have a nice day.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315