| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Activity |
> That actually sounds like a good idea, a consolidation per say. I've > been > away for a long time and am unsure if all of the ego's (which in my > opinion was one of the reasons fidonet died so quickly) are still in play > and would kill that type of idea. When I showed up a few weeks ago, a big brouhaha was going on over gating usenet posts to Fidonet, and vice-versa. Some people don't like change or Fidonet leaking out onto the internet, while others like to see Fidonet expand and adapt to the times. It's hard to choose a side for me, since I see reasoning on both sides. So while I wouldn't rule out the possibility of people being against other networks meshing back into Fidonet, I'm not sure what exactly the complaints could be, either. But I was just thinking that the reason there are other networks might be to in fact avoid the politics here in the first place. Personally I feel that nearly any idea that could bring even a couple new people into the fold is worth considering. Popularity happens in a snowball effect, and you have to start somewhere. --- D'Bridge 2.98* Origin: FyBBS (1:229/500) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 14/250 300 34/999 90/1 114/635 120/228 123/500 134/10 140/1 SEEN-BY: 222/2 226/0 249/303 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1410 1411 1418 SEEN-BY: 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 393/68 396/45 633/104 260 262 267 712/848 SEEN-BY: 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 200 2905/0 @PATH: 229/500 426 123/500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.