| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Corporate variant (SUS) of Windows Update |
From: "Geo."
After reading all that I think I'm going to avoid ever using SUS as it
seems to me that so many machines supplying patches is just asking for
trouble. How do you know none have been hacked like keeps happening with
the Linux community? More machines = more opportunities to get hacked.
You should post your question to the full disclosure security list.
Geo.
"Jan van Hoek (NL)" wrote in
message news:VA.000001c9.00bc1008{at}xs4alldot.nl...
> Within our company (1 head office, 50 branch offices) we are
> planning to start using MS SUS (Software Update Services) to keep
> our workstations (500) and servers (75) up to date. SUS is
> advertised as the corporate variant of Windows Update, the latter
> being designed with the home user in mind. FYI: We are using a
> mixture of Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 2000.
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.