mcculloch@mail.utexas.edu (Jim McCulloch) writes:

> I that case, Sam, although it saddens me, I have to say you were being
> deliberately dishonest, trying to pawn off a quote as supporting Kleck's,
> position, when in fact it you knew very well that the quote in question
> was an integral part of a presentation of evidence that Kleck's
> methodology is fatally flawed.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> --Jim McCulloch

How about Worst regards -- wouldn't that be more Honest?

Respectfully yours (  :-)  :-)  )
John L.

  jrl