TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: nthelp
to: Geo.
from: John Beckett
date: 2004-02-08 09:59:46
subject: Re: Corporate variant (SUS) of Windows Update

From: John Beckett 

"Geo."  wrote in message
news::
> > I don't know the details, but the official statement is that all SUS
> > downloads are checked as being signed and unchanged both by SUS, and by AU
> > on each client (when it gets the update from SUS).
>
> so if one is unsigned, does it ask if you want to accept it or does it just
> reject the download?

I don't know -- you would need to somehow inject a fake file to find out.

I'm not saying that signing is invincible. Presumably people will take a
serious look at it once the easy vulnerabilities have gone.
However, Microsoft at least have their heart in the right place, and if
they did it correctly, it would be pretty well impossible to download a
fake update without some sort of warning (and the admin has to approve the
updates before they are actually applied).

John

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.