| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Situation on R2:50 |
Hello Roy. 30 May 06 12:06, you wrote to me: MvdV>> P4 was written with little or no concern for the situation MvdV>> outside Z1 period. RW> I'm sure that it wasn't, but then, there's been too many RW> interpretations that are in error from Z2. Who is to judge what interpretations are in error? We have no independent judges and the original writers have all left. MvdV>> For one it tacitly assumes local calls are free. RW> And they are. In most parts of the US and Canada. In most other parts of the world local calls are not free. MvdV>> So it does not matter who calls who when it comes to the host's MvdV>> obligation of delivering incoming routed mail. RW> The host isn't obligated to deliver routed mail, only coordinate it's RW> delivery or pickup. Right.... RW> It's been my experience that a host will require those sysops under it RW> to fetch their own mail from the host or hub. A requirement that is outside policy and therefore falls under the header of a dictatorial decree. MvdV>> In Z2 local calls are *not* free and so it does matter who MvdV>> calls who. That is just one example, there are many others. RW> As I described it above. Dictatorship.... RW>>> Of course, but many of them didn't know best and they had no RW>>> common sense. Many of them ran their nets and regions like a RW>>> dictatorship... MvdV>> Actually in the past when FidoNet was run by the technicians, MvdV>> the *C's ever so often *did* know best. RW> Ummmm, those were the dictators I pointed out above. A dictatorship *can* be an effective way to run something. It has proven to be the best way to run a ship... RW> It is only lately that things have been freed up. Unfortunately in most cases the dictatorships were replaced by anarchie. Which got us from the fire into the frying pan. MvdV>> Now that the technicians have left and the politicians have MvdV>> taken over, it has become a free for all with little or no MvdV>> regard for what once was called "the smooth operation of the MvdV>> network" ..... RW> I find the network is operating smoother than it has in the past. Really? It has become a free for all. The nodelist is a mess and does not reflect reality, routing ever so often leads into a black hole, *Cs are asleep with their system on autopilot, universal connectivity is down the drain. I think the network is on the verge of collaps. RW> Nobody is enforcing ZMH, for instance. And that, is not an improvement. Ignoring ZMH is detrimental to connectivity IMNSHO. RW> Well, maybe in Z2. Hardly. In the past NCs used to do regular checks to see if the nodes were still on-line. Now many are afraid for what they will find: black holes. So now they refrain from checking lest they would have to strike half the nodes from their nodelist segment.... :-( Michiel --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315* Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 280/5555 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.