Alex,
 
> I talk not about fts-type of communication (which, also, has a
> great space for improvements), but about many silly restrictions
> FidoNet has. They are guilty for FidoNet losing its location
> under the Sun.
 
Sorry, I must be communicating with someone from another planet.
 
Please explain to me a number of those restrictions and what exactly their
destructive nature is. Now don't go inventing things, real stuff only.
 
> Internet proceeded only because it had not silly restrictions and
> regulations. It didn't "fall apart of its own weight", which is
> what FidoNet was afraid of ..
 
You seem to think you are quite an authority in these matters. Personally I
think you are just image-building for some other matter, whatever it may
be.
 
> It is because some short-sighted people limited FidoNet very strictly
> at some point. At the start it was quite flexible and adjustable.
 
Where were you at the start to be able to make such statements.
 
Take care,
 
 \%/{at}rd

--- D'Bridge 2.41