PE>> Nope.
RS> Yep.
Nope.
PE>>> NO-ONE is EVER FORCED to carry ANY echomail area against their will.
RS>> Irrelevant with an echo which isnt supposed to have commercial
RS>> traffic in it like say Trevs Aust_Trading. You are entitled to expect
RS>> that if you do carry that, the occasional commercial one will get
RS>> stomped. And entitled to PC the sysop of a system who couldnt care less.
PE>> Sorry, AUST_TRADING and Trev's rules
PE>> of the sea don't rate a mention in P4.
RS> Pity that use of Fido for commercial traffic DOES
RS> rate a mention, and so that could indeed be PCed.
ROUTING commercial traffic you terminal woolly.
PE>> Same as AUST_ADS actually.
RS> Nope, you've got your head right up your bum as usual.
Same bullshit as usual when caught out. There is *NO* difference between
AUST_ADS and AUST_TRADING as far as P4 is concerned. *NO* difference. BFN.
Paul.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|