| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | HDs |
Al salaam a'alaykum Roy 14 Oct 03 03:54, Roy J. Tellason wrote to David Drummond: RJT>> Did you put swap anyplace in particular? At the beginning? The RJT>> end? DD>> Two swap partitions at the beginning. The OS boos from partition 3. RJT> My initial install put it at the end, but what I've done since RJT> then, on subsequent drives (and therefore easier to re-do the RJT> partitioning) has had swap at the beginning as well. Either extreme RJT> would give roughly equal seek times and the outer tracks should give RJT> a higher transfer rate if it's going to vary any based on the RJT> physical aspects of the disk. RJT> I don't think I'd put two on the same drive, though. I did have RJT> two running for a while in this machine here, one on the drive I'd RJT> been running and one on the drive I put in. Separate spindles RJT> always seems to be a good way to optimize things. Unless one only has a single drive. The reason for two swap partitions is that the apparent maximum size for a swap partition in Slackware 8 (and below) is 128Mb. I wanted 256Mb swap space. Regards, David --- Msged/LNX TE 06 (pre)* Origin: JabberWOCky. (3:640/305) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 640/305 954 774/605 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.