From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: dxmm{at}albury.nospam.net.au
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

Wiseguy wrote:
> "Daniel47{at}teranews.com"  wrote in
> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367{at}fx18.iad:
>
>> wheresourblessing{at}israels.wars wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just that your answer will only
>>> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way or the other.
>>>
>>> And you don't want that, so of course, that is why you refuse to
>>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>
>>> But even so, you still don't appear to be "wise"
enough to understand
>>> that your stubborn refusal to answer my question exposes you as well.
>>>
>>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>
>> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then and leave us trekkers to
>> discuss Trek stuff here??
>>
>> Daniel
>
> No, he's too stupid for that.

One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!

Daniel

--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux