| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | NodelistGuide or FAQ |
Hello Steven.
01 Nov 02 23:24, you wrote to me:
RVR>> You need to advise your RC that by using the Pvt flag does not
RVR>> make you a private node in this case. Therefore you should be
RVR>> allowed as an RIN because you are not "private" you are fully
RVR>> contactable just like any other.
SH> If I insisted on it, my RC might give me the Pvt flag. However, for
SH> reasons I have already given, both he and I are of the view that the
SH> "Pvt" flag is inappropriate. I note that the Z1C concurs.
It complies with the FTSC standards, thats what is required.
SH> In other words, allow us to list in a way which works for us. The
SH> dummy
SH> telephone number works just as well as the "Pvt" flag and
is much more
SH> consistent with the function of the nodelist as an indicator of a node's
SH> status.
Nope, according to my attempts your IP address is uncontactable.
Cheers,
Rick
... A program is used to turn data into error messages.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5 - Debian/GNU
* Origin: Vampyre's Heaven BBS (3:640/954)SEEN-BY: 120/544 123/500 633/260 262 267 270 284 285 634/383 640/954 1674 SEEN-BY: 654/0 690/682 713/615 771/4020 774/605 800/1 2432/200 7105/1 @PATH: 640/954 774/605 633/260 285 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.