From: "Jeff Shultz" 

She's making the charge that the Clinton Administration has been pulling
illegal end-runs around both the Legislative (by mis-applying laws they
have passed) and Judical branches. Drop back and read the one from the
25th, it has a bit more info of the sort you might be seeking.

--
Jeff Shultz
http://www.wvi.com/~jbshultz
As a student, my job is asking questions.


"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
news:MPG.137a70852ecf139198981b{at}news.barkto.com...
39105e77$1{at}w3.nls.net>, si{at}wvi.com says...
> > Ah, here's a link to the Linda Chavez  column... apparently she does
know
> > something about that warrant...
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/chavez1.asp
>
> I read this column last week in the Tribune (Yes, Bill, that would allow
me to
> have prior knowledge of the warrant you spoke of). What case is Ms. Chavez
> making here? That the 11th Circuit erred in not considering the change in
> custody as a contempt of the April 19 ruling? She seems to believe that
the
> courts weren't involved -- even though she notes that there is a search
> warrant, which must be issued by a court.
>
> I have never been impressed by Ms. Chavez' ability to think or write
> critically. This is a good example.
>
> BTW, her column *still* does not have much information (6 words out of
context)
> about the contents of the warrant.
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5