PC> Is CSet++ v2.1 a good compiler?

PE> 2.0 is anyway.  But so is EMX.  Why don't you use EMX 0.9b?  BFN. 
PE> Paul.  -!-

PC> I haven't seen you in a while, was wondering where you've been!? :-)

I don't normally do anything in this particular echo.  AUST_C_HERE,
MSGED_ECHO and NET_DEV I spend some time in.

PC> I do use EMX v0.9b, but I thought that IBM's compilers are the best
PC> choice for doing OS/2 specific apps.

In other words, you didn't actually have any problem with EMX, you just had
some cash burning a hole in your pocket, right?  :-)  CSET gives you a
profiler and a debugger.

PC> Oh..., have you seen the C++ Cubus OS/2 Class Library?  It supports all
PC> the major OS/2 compilers and is FREEWARE with source code!

No, I rarely use C++.  I write object-oriented C.  BFN.  Paul. 
@EOT:

---