On 12-12-97, SCOTT PARKS said to JEFF GUERDAT:
JG> 'Twould seem that your LWP is improperly set up.  Can you
JG> access ANYTHING more than that one router hop away?  How
JG> about anything else on that subnet?  Are you using matching
JG> protocols?
SP>Well I have the MS TCP/IP for Windows working but it will require
SP>dumping any DOS terminal programs that used TCP/IP.
Run 'em under Windows.
SP>As I remember when I first setup an Exchange client with LWP I
SP>was able to connect across a single router but could not
SP>authenticate for a password change. Since that time we gained
SP>a router and I could not connect at all.  The 95 clients also
SP>had the authentication problem without an LMHOSTS file but that
SP>was easily added.
Did you see Doug Sharp's comments to me on this topic?  Came in the same
packet as your response to me:
DS>Here's another question to the two good ones above, I hope SP is
DS>following the thread. Have you investigated black hole routing
DS>possibilities? MTU size changes can cause fragmentation of packets going
DS>through multiple routers. If an NT server doesn't have the setting to
DS>allow fragmentation of packets one of the routers will be unavailable
DS>and eat packets. This often happens when using FDDI or Token Ring
DS>because of the larger packet size available with those
DS>mediums/protocols over ethernet.
DS>MS has a good document on this and explains the possible fixes.
---
*Durango b200 #NR* DurangoMail for Windows NT/95
 * KMail 3.10o Knight Moves
--- QScan/PCB v1.17b / 01-0406
---------------