Rick Van Ruth (3:640/954) wrote to Steven Horn at 07:35 on 25 Oct 2002:

 RVR> Hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but the listing is incorrect
 RVR> according to FTSC standards. However it does conform to a Zone 1
 RVR> standard which may or may not have been authorised by the Z1C (and
 RVR> thus overriding the FTSC standard).

You can always tell my RC.  I don't normally tell him what to do.

 RVR> That difference in standards is the 1-000-000-000 phone number.

Damn.  I rather liked that.:-) 

 RVR> Also IBN:northof60.tzo.com is not required as you already have
 RVR> your IP address in the system name field so you really only need
 RVR> the IBN flag without any further info.

I've thought about that but I do vaguely recall that some people don't like
IBN flags without further information.  Apart from that, one can argue that
what is in the system name field is the system name and not the IP address
which appears in the IBN field.  Can I help it that the two are
identical?:-) 

Take care,

Steven Horn (steven_a_horn{at}yahoo.ca)
Moderator, ALASKA_CHAT 

--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+