| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | netcomm |
On Mar 07, 1996 at 13:59, Bill Grimsley of 3:640/305.9 wrote:
BL>> You can nearly put a figure on how much better the USR is, compared to
BL>> NetComm M34's.
BG>
BG> I wouldn't go quite that far, but USR/USR connects certainly appear to be
BG> much better than USR/NetComm, no dispute there at all.
That's like saying, "Well, it's clear now that walking around in the
rain results in one getting wet. Quite !{at}#&*ing clear, actually."
The same can be said for USR/Viper, or USR/Thunder, or NetComm/USR, or
MaestroSE/NetComm, or .. or .. Where are we going here?! :-(
BG> I'm of the same opinion, but USR/USR links are definitely superior.
NetComm/NetComm are more superior than USR/NetComm links, too. :-)
Cheers..
- dave
d.begley{at}ieee.org
---
* Origin: [ epicentre of the universe -- sydney australia ] (3:711/934.4)SEEN-BY: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.