BG> What I am suggesting is that a USR to USR will work better than
BG> a NetComm to USR, on the SAME poor line.  Do you dispute that?

RS> Yes, we dont KNOW its a poor line now that we KNOW the USR stats
RS> are meaningless unless there is a Courier on each end. AND we DO
RS> know that WITH a Courier on each end, your line to Paul isnt too bad.

What makes you think that its not the other way around?  The
stats are accurate when there's a Netcomm online, and stuffed
when there's another USR online?  Or indeed, stuffed for both?
BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---