From: "Rich"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01D0_01C3F237.0D8EC7D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
They are part of redhat linux 9 which is why redhat took the =
responsiblity you are trying to claim they do not have. If Sony were =
reselling redhat linux which included these vulnerable components then I =
would expect redhat to take responsibility unless Sony and redhat have =
agreed that Sony would be responsible.
Does your employer, Sun, have a policy that they are not responsible =
for third-party software and hardware that they ship as part of their =
products? That should scare a great number of people off of using Sun =
products.
Let's make this easier for you so that you don't have to feel you are =
being asked to speak for sun. Do you think that companies in general, =
not just your employer, should have the policy of disclaiming =
responsiblity that you are advocating?
Rich
"Adam Flinton" wrote in message =
news:402d350d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Ah right so if sony bundle linux & Gaim & mutt then Gaim & mutt would =
be=20
Sony vulnerabilites because they are part of sony's product.
Adam
Rich wrote:
> No they would be Sony vulerabilities because they are parts of =
Sony's=20
> product and not part of Windows.
> =20
> Rich
> =20
>=20
> "Adam Flinton" > wrote in message
> news:402c82c1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Geo. wrote:
>=20
> > if it's part of the distribution it counts.
> >
>=20
> Thnking about it.....my borther's SOny laptop came with XP & a =
whole
> host of apps rwady installed...so I take it that all those apps =
that
> came installed with the box (e.g. WinDVD etc) are all thus =
Windows
> vulns
> if a problem is found?
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Adam
------=_NextPart_000_01D0_01C3F237.0D8EC7D0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
They are
part of redhat =
linux 9 which=20
is why redhat took the responsiblity you are trying to claim they do not =
have. If Sony were reselling redhat linux which included these =
vulnerable=20
components then I would expect redhat to take responsibility unless Sony = and=20
redhat have agreed that Sony would be responsible.
Does your
employer, Sun, =
have a policy=20
that they are not responsible for third-party software and hardware that = they=20
ship as part of their products? That should scare a great number
= of people=20
off of using Sun products.
Let's
make this easier for =
you so that=20
you don't have to feel you are being asked to speak for sun. Do =
you think=20
that companies in general, not just your employer, should have the
= policy=20
of disclaiming responsiblity that you are advocating?
Rich
"Adam Flinton" <adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.com=">mailto:adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.com">adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.com=
>=20
wrote in message news:402d350d$1{at}w3.nls.net...Ah=20
right so if sony bundle linux & Gaim & mutt then Gaim & =
mutt would=20
be Sony vulnerabilites because they are part of sony's=20
product.AdamRich
wrote:> No =
they=20
would be Sony vulerabilities because they are parts of Sony's > =
product=20
and not part of Windows.> >
Rich> =
>=20
> "Adam
Flinton" <adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.com=">mailto:adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.com">adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.com=
> =20
<mailto:adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.=">mailto:adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.com">mailto:adam_NO_{at}_SPAM_softfab.=
com>>=20
wrote in message> news:402c82c1{at}w3.nls.net...>=
=20
Geo. wrote:>
>
> if =
it's part=20
of the distribution it
counts.> =20
>>
> Thnking about
it.....my=20
borther's SOny laptop came with XP & a=20
whole> host of
apps rwady =
installed...so I take=20
it that all those apps
that> came =
installed=20
with the box (e.g. WinDVD etc) are all thus=20
Windows> =
vulns> =20
if a problem is found?> >
> >=20
>
Adam
------=_NextPart_000_01D0_01C3F237.0D8EC7D0--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267
|