RS> And thats ALL I ever said, that WHEN its seen with JUST a pair of Spirits,
RS> its COMPELLING evidence that the Spirit has a double send problem.
                                               ^^^
                                               
Yes, Dave Hatch has indeed said that he has seen A double send
problem.  One that occurs on 0% of Spirit-Spirit connects.

RS> Thats just a comment on the circumstances that produces the
RS> timing that makes the Spirit exhibit its double send bug.
RS> Says nothing useful whatever about whether IT HAS ONE.

Yes, I agree, it could well have one that occurs 0% of the time.

PE> So rare that it isn't even worth fixing.

RS> You dont know that, and its NOT true when a Maestro is receiving the file.

Ah, that's a DIFFERENT double-send problem.  One that occurs 100%
of the time, and is CERTAINLY worth fixing.

PE> The Maestro bug is COMPLETELY different.
PE> It is reproducible by anyone, happens every time.

RS> You dont KNOW that when a file is flowing from the Spirit to the Maestro,
RS> THAT YOU ARE SEEING A FAULT IN THE MAESTRO. 

Of course I don't, that's what you need a datascope for.

RS> In fact since the Maestro isnt
RS> even sending the fucking file, and the Binkley behind the Spirits timing
RS> eliminates it forever, ITS MOST FUCKING UNLIKELY. Particularly when the

Nope, doesn't eliminate it forever, happens every time.

RS> receiving modem in my case says its not asking for blocks to be sent twice.

And a Maestro tech says that the Maestro is receiving a short 
block and asking for a resend.  Sounds like you Rockwell owners
can't even maintain a consistent line of bullshit.

RS> You are desperately clutching at straws Paul.

And have to desparately clutch at straws trying to prove that 0% = 100%.

RS> I've binned the rest of this shit, if you dont have the mental
RS> horsepower to grasp the basic stuff above, there aint any point
RS> in trying to get the more complex stuff below thru you thick skull.

You're the one who brought it up again.  You know what the end result
of these conversations are.  You are never able to convince me that
0% = 100%, and I need a datascope to see for myself.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---