| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | I must be getting old |
Pascal Schmidt wrote in a message to Paul Rogers: PS> Hi Paul! :-) PR> Considering all the work that got done PR> on IBM S/360 OS/MVT mainframes, all of which were 4MB or less--the PR> architecture placed a 16MB limit on addressability--one wonders why PR> one needs a 1GB DIMM. PS> Well, nowadays the most important use for lots of memory (at least PS> under Unix-like operating systems) is disk cache. Memory is already PS> slow from the CPU's point of view, going to disk awfully so. I would tend to agree with this, since the system I'm using at this point is apparently spending a fair amount of time swapping stuff back and forth from the HD. It gets to be a real drag, at times. PS> Of my 640M, about 500M are disk cache most of the time. I would guess that this would change based on what mix of applications you're running, do you find this to be the case? ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 396/45 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.