| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Cheap RAM for Ewe |
DM> Just remember, the LBA and standard geometry are not compatible. Thats not necessarily true. I just had occasion to prove that on a 540MB installed in an older motherboard without LBA using the traditional 1024/16/63 in that motherboard. Installed a new motherboard with LBA support and you could use either NORMAL or LBA with all the drive and data etc perfectly fine. Corse the partition only had the 528MB size that 1024/16/63 produces. Basically it depends on the mapping from LBA to CHS, if that doesnt change when LBA is enabled, so the sequence of sectors doesnt change, it works fine. The short story is that many drives use the params that it presents to the bios in an identify request used with the auto identify function of the bios as the mapping for LBA too. So it still uses the same sectors per track and heads. That means that enabling the LBA still sees the same sequence of sectors, down one track, to the max sectors per track, then incrementing the track number till the max head number, then incrementing the track number, even in LBA mode, so the sequence of sectors doesnt change as you enable LBA. @EOT: ---* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.