| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Computer dead end |
BL> Ahem. That means reflection along 10-metres will be 10-times BL> less (which is why I used the larger number). I could look up BL> the book and give you the formaulas, but I can't be bothered. BL> Trust me, I'm an engineer. JB> maybe the impedance mismatch is a problem, the ethernet cards JB> are designed to drive 25 ohm load when they're sending. (50 on JB> each end of the run) That's not how it works. If you hook a string of computers to a 50-ohm cable, each able to send and recieve, then you have to send using a constant courrent source (>> 50 ohms) and receive with a high impedance (>> 50 ohms). That's a recipe for disaster if you don't terminate, becasue the *voltage* can rise to high levels (above the actual sending voltage). The *ideal* situation, is to terminate both ends of the cable with 50 ohms. All the computers see a 25-ohm load and source, and reflections along the cable are absorbed by the matched load at either end. Of course, what happens *along* the cable at each site is another matter. You then design the transmitter to provide enough *current* into the 25-ohms (as you said) to generate enough *voltage* to drive the receiver. The sytem is a compromise that just doesn't work, which is why they have changed to the hub method and individual cables. The point I am making is that if you only terminate on one end, the losses along the cable effectively terminate the other end. The voltage doubles (at worst), but even a Chinese designer would allow that much tolerance in the system, and in any case, losses in those *really* skinny cables will make sure it never happens. With only *two* computers at distances over 3m, it is actually better to only terminate one end, and it doesn't matter which end. JB> And while they're sending they also need to be able to detect JB> if another card is sending... I'd bet that removing the JB> terminators would mess with that. How do they do that? They *have* to pause, because two transmitting simultaneously would mean at best a 2:1 shift in level, and 2:1 is not nearly enough. Do they use carriers, or something? With a carrier, levels wouldn't matter a rat's arse. JB>> I'm told that if you pull the terminator off the cable it JB>> stops working. BL> ROFL! BL> I don't doubt that you have been told that. Christopher BL> Columbus was told he'd sail off the edge of the world. JB> Those telling Columbus didn't claim to have tried it JB> themselves. The key word in that statement is "claim," JB> I'm not talking uniwankers either, these were schoolkids... we JB> never had ethernet at school while I was there or I'd have JB> tried it myself. Schoolkids! Jesus... ROFL!! (and slapping my thighs, choking, and coughing chardonnay on the keyboard) When I was a schoolkid, my favourite legend was the brother who got his sister pregnant by masturbating in the bath. I always wanted to try that... (getting a sister pregnant, that is). Regards, Bob --- BQWK Alpha 0.5* Origin: Precision Nonsense, Sydney (3:712/610.12) SEEN-BY: 633/104 260 262 267 270 285 640/296 305 384 531 954 1042 690/734 SEEN-BY: 712/610 848 774/605 800/221 445 @PATH: 712/610 640/531 954 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.