| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Paul + Netcomm |
Rod, at 13:27 on Mar 08 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley... RS> Certainly with a decent modern digital exchange at each end, RS> the signal is digitised at the line card on the end of the RS> subs line, at the exchange end, and then nothing that happens RS> at the digital level between the line cards can degrade the RS> data between the exchanges other than a fault condition. BG> Exactly, and you might just notice that that's what I've been saying. RS> So why were you raving on about what happens in FO previously ? I was simply stating that even though signal levels should remain constant throughout its entire length, it is still possible that this may not always be the case. I also quite specifically stated that you can more or less take it as read that they do just that. RS> Yes, you have come to realise that once its got into the RS> FO network, it cant vary call to call, but you were claiming RS> the opposite at one time with your 'theoretically' type stuff. No need to put words into my mouth just because you misunderstood what I was saying about FO. Of course the potential problems are mainly theoretical, but it's also important to know that they CAN still occur. Regards, Bill --- Msgedsq/2 3.20* Origin: Logan City, SEQ (3:640/305.9) SEEN-BY: 640/305 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.