| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | netcomm |
david, at 20:18 on Mar 07 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley...
BL> You can nearly put a figure on how much better the USR is, compared to
BL> NetComm M34's.
BG> I wouldn't go quite that far, but USR/USR connects certainly appear to be
BG> much better than USR/NetComm, no dispute there at all.
db> That's like saying, "Well, it's clear now that walking around
in the rain
db> results in one getting wet. Quite !{at}#&*ing clear, actually."
Not whilst wearing a Driza-Bone, but I take your point. :)
db> The same can be said for USR/Viper, or USR/Thunder, or NetComm/USR, or
db> MaestroSE/NetComm, or .. or .. Where are we going here?! :-(
Just like the past 4 weeks, in ever-decreasing circles. I'm beginning to
wonder who will disappear up their own fundamental orifice first.
And just quietly, I also have my own preference...
BG> I'm of the same opinion, but USR/USR links are definitely superior.
db> NetComm/NetComm are more superior than USR/NetComm links, too. :-)
Possibly. :)
Regards, Bill
--- Msgedsq/2 3.20
* Origin: Logan City, SEQ (3:640/305.9)SEEN-BY: 640/305 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.