david, at 18:55 on Mar 07 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley...

BG> Half-duplex V.34 operation comes to mind...

db> That looks like a "must have"...

Agreed, and especially with bi-directional FTPs.

BG> ...as do the 200 bps auxilliary channels, 64 state Trellis coding...

db> ...whereas the auxiliary channel (There can be Only One[tm])

Plural, as in one on each modem.  :)

db> is definitely optional, and my interpretation says likewise for 64-state 
db> trellis coding.

OK, I'm quite happy to accept that.

db> That doesn't mean NetComm/Rockwell isn't 100% V.34 *compliant*, though.  
db> :-)

Interesting word, "compliant".  Transposing the 6th and 7th
characters reminds me of my prior dealings with NetComm...

Regards, Bill

--- Msgedsq/2 3.20