BG> I must admit that when I tried the M34F/M34F combination here last
BG> night, the figures were much worse than I'd originally expected,
BG> and I was considerably less than impressed.  I expected a much
BG> better signal quality than that which I actually saw, and of all
BG> reported connects to date, the USR/USR has consistently been the
BG> best, with (strangely enough) the USR/M34F a close second.

The EQM numbers are pretty meaningless with a modern protocol like V34.
You just CANT quantify the wide variety of data about a particular
session into a single number and expect it to mean a damned thing.

The only thing that really means much is the much more detailed
stuff the USRs make available to the user. And even then there
is some massive problem there that has not been resolved.
@EOT:

---