Rod, at 14:20 on Mar 13 1996, you wrote to Paul Edwards...

RS> In this particular situation it would clearly be desirable to hire
RS> some test equipment, and actually measure the FNQ/Bulldog sessions,
RS> and the FNQ/Bill sessions, and the Bill/You sessions, and the FNQ/You
RS> sessions and compare the results from that with what the Courier/Courier
RS> frequency response curves claim the frequency response is.
RS> When thats not practical, and the Courier/Courier stats do clearly show
RS> that the FNQ/Bulldog sessions are MUCH better than say FNQ/Bill and still
RS> better than FNQ/You, we do have SOME useful information on yours and Bills
RS> line, particularly when the Courier/Courier stats do correlate with the
RS> thruput in CPS. Its silly to just bin that data when you are short of data.
RS> Tho important to remember that its a bit of a worry.
RS> Thats why I would want to actually confirm that Courier/Sportster stats
RS> are the SAME as Courier/Courier stats over the same session too.

Are you related to Sir Humphrey Appleby, by any chance ?

Regards, Bill

--- Msgedsq/2 3.20