JANE KELLEY was thinking about Action On Research and keyed into 
cyberspace:
JK>MP>What is even sadder is that you failed to answer my questions. I
JK>MP>asked only two, and a "yes" or "no" will do.
JK>EVERYTHING printed in the field of chemical dependency by those who
JK>are serious researchers or by those who write about what they have
JK>done is subject to "peer review", the most critical in the history of
JK>human thought.  It is subject to review by every sober drunk in the
JK>world. And they can be quite specific when reviewing anything.
You have got to be kidding. I thought you had some form of knowledge 
about scientific research. You do not even know what peer review is. 
JK>Got news for you.  What I quote has passed that test with the
JK>exception of Rosencrans work.  That didn't seem to penetrate
JK>down....but Blum's work did.  So has Terry Neher's and the other
JK>gentleman I quoted.  Where do you think I found out about them?
When you were going to 12 step meetings yourself?
JK>MP>JK{ Have you found the paper by Jeffery Rosencrans as yet?  The
JK>MP>JK{ one on the two animo acids?
JK>MP>FIDO was significantly interupted on Long Island for about a week.
JK>MP>A complete library reference by you will allow for my obtaining
JK>MP>it. 
JK>You do your own research.  You are supposed to be so damn smart so go
JK>find it.  I got mine by hearing of his work then writing the hospital
JK>several years ago.  Mine is from the author, not from a journal.
Close. I am, "so damn smart". You made the claim, you prove it.
                   ===>Mark Probert<===
             watch here for new email address....
---
 * CMPQwk #1.4 * UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
---------------