| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Failure |
BG> The negotiation phase still sounds extremely solid, and another BG> rather interesting thing is that the time it takes to connect BG> with your M34F is exactly the same as it takes with Dave's Courier. BG> Perhaps it's only V.32ter which utilises the USR's proprietary fast BG> connects after all (as I suspected)? Nope, the much shorter time even with V32bis USRs is measurable. It may well be that V34 is better enough that there isnt as much for USR to improve on with V34 at both ends. BG> Dunno what the \V6 does, but if it's purely the degree BG> of verbosity of connect stats, I can't see that making BG> the slightest bit of difference to our connects. True, but its got to be tested in case there is some quirk. BG> However, it will be interesting to see if putting your DTE back up to BG> 57600 starts causing problems, although I'm no longer convinced that BG> it will. The more I use this mmodem, the more it's starting to look BG> as if the previous ROM code was very ordinary on marginal line levels. Yeah, looks like it. BG> And look Paul, I'm even quite happy to freely admit that BG> my USR may have actually had some bugs after all. :) I think you should be ashamed of yourself. @EOT: ---* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.