From: Ellen K. 

Why the extra step?

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:15:56 -0500, "Geo."
 wrote in message :

>No, print to postscript file then put in a watch directory and acrobat
>converts it to pdf.
>
>Geo.
>
>"Ellen K." 
wrote in message
>news:r59g30ljp0hhtqsrf3djhpd5773tgr6rjo{at}4ax.com...
>> I hope you don't mean print to paper, scan into pdfs... you can
"print"
>> to PDF maker and do it in one shot.
>>
>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:07:04 -0500, "Geo."
 wrote in
>> message :
>>
>> >"Chris Robinson"
 wrote in message
>> >news:403487fc{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >
>> >
>> >> I have tried to prevent this happening in the future by informaing
>> >> users about image compression.  I've also got a Linux box running a
>> >> simple image compression script on the network - users
drop images in
>> >> the "INBOX", wait a minute, and they appear in
the "OUTBOX".
>> >
>> >Just a thought after you mentioned this. I have pretty much the same
>thing
>> >except it converts postscript files into PDF (they drop the
.ps file into
>> >the IN directory and a PDF appears in the OUT directory). If these docs
>> >never change you could just print them, convert to PDF (which
will reduce
>> >the graphics size automatically) and store them as pdf files instead of
>doc
>> >files.
>> >
>> >Geo.
>> >
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5