| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Computer dead end |
> I'll say one thing for Bill Gates: his approach to setup makes > amateurs like Linux look *really* amateurish. Why the hell don't > they just copy Windows? It's not like they have to work it out > for themselves - Bill's already done it for them. LL> Errrrr.... why copy a badly designed, overbloated, LL> virus-ridden, insecure piece of crud "operating system" like LL> Windows ? Doesn't make a great deal of sene from this end..... I don't mean copy the code, which would be illegal under copyright; I mean copy the ideas, the layout, and the methods... the way that Gates copied Apple's icons. The *hard* part of any product is the original idea. Once you have the idea, the rest is just going through the mechanics of *doing* it. This is where Microsoft fails. They started in the wrong place with DOS (which was given to Gates anyway) and Bill has done brilliantly since, being smart enough to tell the bad from the good ideas that he stole, guided by a philosophy he may not even be aware that he follows: to make the PC *easy* for the user, hiding a complexity *he* controls, under a pretty interface that runs as automatically as possible. *This* is why Windows stuffs up. His code is basically as good as it gets, but in making it easy to use, he leaves holes that bastards drive straight through. Linux, on the other hand, has a philosophy still trapped back in the 80s before Windows, when PCs were the domain of enthusiasts and hackers. What makes me scream with frustration, is that efforts to put this right like X11, Gnome and KDE strat from scratch with their own GUI and losr the plot when all they have to do is copy Windows. The whole thing exists, they don't have to *invent* anything, Gates has perfected the basic Windows system over 20 years... all they have to do is dump DOS and its bastard child NT, and adapt the beautiful Windows concept to the correct Linux platform. Of course, being Uniwankers they can't do that. They have to do it their *own* way, stuff it up, make it hard, and the text editor rules okay. Regards, Bob --- BQWK Alpha 0.5* Origin: Precision Nonsense, Sydney (3:712/610.12) SEEN-BY: 633/104 260 262 267 270 285 640/296 305 384 531 954 1042 690/734 SEEN-BY: 712/610 848 774/605 800/221 445 @PATH: 712/610 640/531 954 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.