From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: graemecree{at}aol.com
Subject: Re: The alt.tv.star-trek.tos FAQ

On Thursday, November 7, 2013 7:43:12 PM UTC-6, anim8rfsk wrote:
> Check out the historical records in COURT MARTIAL.
Bridge recordings, yes.  I wouldn't be surprised if they record that 24/7. 
If the scenes in Archer/Kirk's quarters are from historical records, that's
kind of creepy.  No wonder nobody goes to the bathroom on Star Trek.
> What was shown on screen throughout the entire series was that it was 
> completely out of continuity with real Trek.  What was shown in the  
> terrible finale was that it was a holonovel.
That's the bottom line.  Wiseguy, who's so insistent that we go by what's
onscreen... refuses to acknowledge what's onscreen.
> Well, quasi historical.  Like a James Mitchner book.  Or a Dixon Hill 
> game.
Well, that's the real question.  Is the book based on a "real"
Captain Archer, or is he fictional even within the fictional world of Star
Trek?  I'm guessing that there was no Captain Archer at all.  If there had
been, his estate would be suing the publisher of the holonovel for
portraying him as such an incompetent buffoon.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux