| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Knoppix |
Matt Mc_Carthy wrote in a message to Roy J. Tellason: CA>>> There will never be enough hard drive space or memory but you CA>>> probably already realize that. I dream of 1 gig of memory CA>>> knowing at some point I would want more. Everything is just so CA>>> darn fast when in-memory and not reading/writing to the hard CA>>> drive. :-) PS>> Heh. Exactly the reason why I have 640M in my machine. Now PS>> imagine how fast a machine with an on-CPU cache of that size PS>> would be. ;) CA>> Intel will get around to that eventually. :-) RJT> Or making some CPU that _requires_ such... :-) MMC> If you want to KNOW what the difference is, just go to CMOS and MMC> select "Disable" for your "Internal CPU cache". When it boots, MMC> you will swear you were running an old XT computer, or slower! MMC> With the internal cache disabled (which I have to do for my EPROM MMC> burner), this 500MHz system takes a full 5 minutes to boot to DOS! I remember my first 386 board, that had some sort of a problem with the _external_ cache on it. The machine would be going along fine, and then would just lock up solid. Usually around the point where I was in the middle of entering a message and about to save it, as I recall. Disabling _that_ was no fun, particularly. I'm wondering, with that Celeron box I'm waiting to bring up here, what it is that chip has on board for internal cache. I'll have to look into that. ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 396/45 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.