Hans Mangold wrote in a message to Robert Jung:
 HM> May I suggest that instead of the switch:
 HM>         s: set archive time-Stamp to newest
 HM> this be made the default?
 HM> To me, I have absolutely no use for the date on an archive unless
 HM> it tells me something about the *contents*.
I disagree. I think it's better to have the archive date reflect the creation 
date (and have the option to set it to something else). This simplifies 
making backup scripts.
--- timEd/2 1.10+
---------------