Bart Goddard wrote:
> lsenders{at}hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >> How many times can you assert "P and not P" and think that
> >> anyone will swallow it?  (Like I said, no one is fooled.)
> >>
> > If you would stop being argumentative long enough
>
> What on earth could _that_ mean?  We're having an
> _argument_ so how can either one of us not be "argumentative"?
>
> This is another example of you throwing words together
> that sound nice to you, but they don't mean anything.

As I've already pointed out, do not place your mindset on me.  I am not
being argumentative.  I was discussing.  Obviously there is a
difference of option, but I'm not arguing.  It is a dispositional
thing.  Apparently you no better understand that distinction than that
which I have been trying to discuss with you.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group.  All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
(((   Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post.   )))


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/24/05 8:46:07 PM ---