>Your arguments are nothing new.  THey are
>weak and are based upon not only poor scholarship, but revisionistic
>history.

Um, prove it. To any objective viewer the postings here show that every
assertion made by you and Matthew has been debunked. Both of you use
the typical trinitarian tactics 1) quickly change topics when you are
proven wrong- never finishing any topic 2) use ad hominem and negative
campaigning when you are proven wrong, such as using the "cult" tag or
using strawmen to prove your point 3) attempt to discredit any source
that doesn't agree with your subjective interpretation, such as
complaining about Bible translations, lexicons, manuscripts, etc...

The best you people can do is try to lump everyone who doesn't agree
with you into caterogories, such as "Arianism" or
"cult" or "evil" for
that matter. What you have proven is that you are too emotionally
attached to your beliefs to see the simple truths..truths like God=
Father Jesus= Son. Father existed before the Son.

 You really have to do better than this if you expect a
>respected reply.

LOL. And thus you wave the proverbial "white flag" here.

What caterogory do you put Ignatius who said JESUS WAS CREATED?

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group.  All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
(((   Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post.   )))


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/25/05 12:46:04 PM ---