Hi Ben,


>>>> Anyone have problems with the nut91.rar archive in PDNUNIX?  I've
>>> Have you checked what version of RAR they are using? This does seem
> JK: > The file is ok here... I suspected a corrupted copy but it could be
> JK: > the version.. The person has Rar for dos 2.5, and unrar v3.1.

>I D/L'd UNRAR 3.20 (Wins) and get corrupt headers with it, too, so it must be
> bad archive (and the 1st I can remember in a very long time). The latest
>available UNRar for DOS is 3.13 (though it displays 3.10) and it does the same

>I'm not sure I can upgrade DOS Rar itself (though I just did to 3.20) since th
> online license says 40-day Demo/Shareware only. Is there a PD/Free flavor of
>Rar (?). The latest Linux version of UNRar is broke for me since it requires a
> library I can't find and don't have: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 .

Contact the folks are rarlabs.com - they know of the rar distribution on
the Filegate and I've spoken with a couple of the fellows there. They seem
like fair, good people.

> Seems like a losing battle here ...

> Maybe Zips would be better since everyone can handle those? The Zip you sent

Hm.. we've never had a "standard" archiver on the filegate, but I
can bring it up to the other fdn coordinators in our IFDC echo.

> worked great, and Nut is running under Linux. Thanks again, it's a very handy
> program to have around. I even went to the Home Page and grabbed the DOS
> version so I can run it anywhere. :)  very cool 

Thanks to Sean for finding that one and releasing it :)

Take care,
Janis

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-5