first you puked:

 > >Your arguments are nothing new.  THey are
> >weak and are based upon not only poor scholarship, but revisionistic
> >history.

I responded:

> Um, prove it.

and here's your scholarly response:

>You come into a Christian NG with your spew and then refuse to
>substantiate your position, placing the burden of proof on the NG.
>Ahem, I think the shoe is on the other foot.  Why not lolly gag back
to
>your Jehovah false Witness NG and brag how you have set us
Trinitarians
>to flight.

(sigh) Typical trinitarian response. Why? You obviously don't have
God's spirit. You can claim I didn't "substantiate" my position until
you are blue in the face- it's in the record here- any objective person
can judge for themselves.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group.  All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
(((   Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post.   )))


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/25/05 8:45:59 PM ---