FR> Always. You want to pretend that evolution isn't actually
FR> directly observed in suti and in the laboratory.
bs> Wait!
I'll pause to allow the somewhat slower of mind to catch up, sure.
bs> You mean a species has been observed to evolve into another,
bs> separate species in a lab?
Indeed it has -- and continues to be observed. I know that your masters
dictate that you're not allowed to know such things (leave alone admit the
fact) yet scientists and biology students around the world continue to
observe speciation events.
Who told you to pretend that they don't?
bs> Amazing! Which journal was this published
bs> in? Has it been duplicated in other labs?
Would you like a list of observed speciation events or would you like me
to pick but one or two from a long list and rub your nose in them? I
would like you to decide. That way you can't complain about it later.
FR> The honest Christians are becoming an extinct species.
bs> You admit there are some?
What's to "admit?" Most Christians accept the fact of evolution and seek
to work their occult beliefs around the scientific facts. Only the truly
willfully ignorant and superstitious among us want to pretend otherwise.
The phenomena, by the way, is known as the "god of the gaps." As the
remaining willfully-ignorant cultists among us observe their occult beliefs
systematically destroyed by the unavoidable advancement of science, their
gods and goddesses scramble to fill the gaps science leaves them.
And pray they didn't bring Stephen Hawkin with them. }:-}
FR> Ignore the _thousands_ of documented, falsifiable
FR> newspaper and television accounts,
bs> Anecdotal evidence is hardly a scientific proof.
But then we're not talking about unsupported claims. That's the venue of
religion, silly.
bs> Do you have any scientific studies which verify your assertion?
I'm sure you would like to pretend they're "my assertions." It is an
undeniable fact that speciation events have taken place and that they are
observed within the lifetimes of humans. It can no more be "my assertion"
than comments I might make about gravitation are "my assertion."
Now you may ask (as you may have already done) to review suitable
references which your masters tell you to ignore. Simply ask and I will
be happy to beat you over the head with them. That's what you're here
for, isn't it?
I would also be interested in hearing how your masters tell you to deny
the facts.
FR> The Christian priesthood is undeniably the single most evil
FR> "business" rapeing children and otherwise sexually mollesting
FR> its "clients" there is in the United States.
bs> I'll bet the psychiatric profession competes
bs> rather impressively in this area.
Not according to the summaries of statistical tallys distributed among
the Public Broadcasting television and radio stations around the United
States. In a review called, "Sins of the Fathers" it was repeatedly
underscored that the Christian clergy accounts for the vast majority of
child rape cases within the United States. The position of mock
authority the Christian cult masters are given affords the cult masters
a broad-spectrum channel of children to mollest -- and the Authoritianian
priesthood does its best to shield themselves from the law.
If you wish to doubt the validity of these statements, you need but
state your doubts and I would be more than happy to repost for your
continued discomfort about a thousand criminal cases against the Christian
priesthood.
Since I have never posted the entire series here, I'm sure that others
would benefit from capturing the lengthy series and using it to rub
into the noses of ignorant cultists who think their priesthood has
something of virtue.
http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice/index.htm
frice@linkline.com <
~*~ Davey, you only have two functioning brain cells. It's such a
pity that they reuse to talk to each other. - Dan Ceppa
---
---------------
* Origin: The Skeptic Tank (1:218/890)
|