| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | USR 28.8 Modems |
DD> I use a Courier here (with a Sportster as a backup). DD> I have no complaints regarding their performance at all. PE> Which just goes to show how uncomprehensive your testing really is. BG> Why don't you two compare user lists? If David has more BG> callers (and I suspect that he does), one would expect to see BG> a proportional increase in his problem connects, correct? That really doesnt prove much. We know that Dave line is MUCH better than Pauls from the calls that Russ did from FNQ with a USR on BOTH ends. In fact its starting to look like the Bulldogs zealotry to Lewin quite a few months ago is just a reflection of the bulldogs immaculate line, says very little useful about modem performance at all. Corse we dont actually have a call from Russ/FNQ USR/USR to measure Lews line with, but it wouldnt surprise me at all if it was much worse. We DO know that YOUR line is much worse than the bulldogs and that goes a long way towards explaining your calls to CHH which failed with a Rockwell on CHH with the older USR code, even tho calling from CHH when you tested heaps of modems didnt exhibit the problem. @EOT: ---* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.