Hi Ross,

On 2014-04-22 18:04:36, you wrote to me:

 WV>>>> To start with, which version of FMail are you using?

 WV>> You haven't answered this?

 RC> FMail-W32-1.67.1.47

Ok, just checking if you are using the latest GPL release, or maybe even
the latest release by Folkert...

 RC> What attracted me to Fmail was it is win32.. after so many executions,
 RC> fastecho would stop scanning within the environment, I suspect because
 RC> of being 16 bit and calling command.com.... I would have to invoke
 RC> fastecho manually.

This seems rather strange behavior, if you are restarting it every time...

 WV>> But to be able to do anything with this, I will have to reproduce it,
 WV>> which means I need some message base files from before the switch to
 WV>> fmail, your fmail config files, and an example pkt file to toss with
 WV>> fmail, which causes the symptoms. Would that be possible at all? But
 WV>> I'm wondering would it be worth the trouble, considering the rarity of
 WV>> the use-case.

 RC> Situation rendered moot, when I created a fresh message base.

Pity... I could of course do the same as you, create a message base with
fastecho, and work from there. But there are more important things
regarding fmail to put my time in. ;)

 RC>>> and had a more logical flow to it likefastechoes or even RA's..

 WV>> You should be more specific on what you definition of logical is in
 WV>> this case. ;) I don't know what fastechos or RA's config program looks
 WV>> like. But I don't think I'm gonna do a complete make-over of how
 WV>> fsetup works anyway, the current userbase is used to how things work.
 WV>> But of course that doesn't mean there isn't room for improvement on
 WV>> some of the specifics...

 RC> Are you familiar with Frontdoors setup program and its layout?

Not any more... It must be at least 10 years ago when I last used it...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-W32-1.68.1.61-B20140411